Quantcast
ResurrectionSong.com
Magazines.com, Inc.

Syndication

Thursday, August 09, 2007

Women Aren’t Handicapped. They’re Otherly Abled.

The idea of making car designers acknowledge women’s needs, wants, and differences in automotive preferences seems like good business sense. In one way, I applaud GM for taking the step of dressing their designers in drag--putting them in high heels, giving them fabulous nails, stuff of that nature--to give them a taste of how their truck lines work (or not) for the ladies amongst us. All well and good.

This description from The Car Connection via Autoblog cracks me up, though:

They wore high-heels, fake press-on nails and garbage bag skirts to simulate what The Car Connection refers to as “female handicaps” (are we really calling them that?) while operating various features of their new ‘utes. The result was at least three features on GM’s new SUVs that wouldn’t have been there otherwise: retractable running boards for easier entry/exit in a skirt, a larger center console that can hold a purse and an easier to operate rear lift gate.

“Female handicaps.”

Yeah, I’m betting someone out there is mighty cranky about that little slip…

Comments & Trackbacks
The trackback URL for this entry is:

Did anyone think to maybe get some actual, you know, women for this experiment?

I know they’re engineers, but . . .

on Aug 09 2007 @ 11:28 AM

Solutions that simple rarely cross the mind of a really good engineer.

And designers just like wearing skirts when they get a chance.

on Aug 09 2007 @ 11:31 AM

They’re wasting their time. Everyone knows women can’t drive. rasberry

on Aug 09 2007 @ 11:57 AM

I’m so telling your wife.

on Aug 09 2007 @ 11:59 AM

Maybe they were really trying to capture the cross-dressing market?

on Aug 09 2007 @ 01:32 PM

Gee, and all I want is a pretty car that outruns the police.

on Aug 09 2007 @ 01:35 PM

Just thinking the clutch should engage a little higher off the floor to accommodate my 3” heels. I wonder did they think of that?

on Aug 09 2007 @ 02:12 PM

This truck overcomes “female handicaps”? You mean, there’s a module in there that causes the woman driving it to suddenly realize that putting decorative pillows* on the bed in the morning, closing the bedroom door, and returning twelve hours later to the unused bedroom to remove the pillows to allow actual access to the bed, is a pointless exercise?

*Ladies - they actually come right out and call the pillows “shams”. That’s how little the pillow industry respects your intelligence.

on Aug 09 2007 @ 07:09 PM

Robert, Robert, Robert ... its a truck, not a freakin’ Vatican-certified, full-out Holy Ghost miracle.

on Aug 09 2007 @ 07:57 PM

“… retractable running boards for easier entry/exit in a skirt, a larger center console that can hold a purse and an easier to operate rear lift gate.”

Am I the only one here who looks at that as a veritable gauntlet of double entendres?  Or did you guys just think “easier entry/exit in a skirt” was too obvious to comment upon?

on Aug 09 2007 @ 08:33 PM

Dorkafork, we have pride.

Well, some of us have pride. The rest just didn’t see it.

on Aug 09 2007 @ 11:24 PM

I don’t have pride.

on Aug 10 2007 @ 11:20 AM

All I know is, an SUV is what you get when you let a man design a minivan.

on Aug 10 2007 @ 12:52 PM

Yeah, I’m betting someone out there is mighty cranky about that little slip…

Wait, the garbage bags imitated the skirt, but what did they do to represent a woman’s slip?

Man, the people who said that were high, or perhaps just heels.  They are probably hosed for saying that, too.  You think there is a chance to make-up with the female consumer after such an affront?

on Aug 10 2007 @ 12:52 PM

I’m willing to make some fashion sacrifices for a good driving machine. For instance, I wear kitten-heels when driving the Miata so I can heel-and-toe more comfortably when I downshift on that fast little ess-shaped exit from the freeway into the main parkway for the mall. Gotta keep the rpms up for the super-charger, you know.

But the biggest mistake they make is in seat design. Most women are 9-12” shorter than a man. We just love having that curved-in head of the seat pushing our head forward into the steering wheel. How do American automakers they miss that, year after year after year?

on Aug 12 2007 @ 10:16 AM

They should sell his n’ hers cars. Most cars don’t have quite enough head room for me--and the economy cars force me to tilt my head to one side or the other to fit. I also have a hard time fitting my shoulders comfortably (I have a wingspan of 77” fingertip to fingertip). But to see my girlfriend sitting in the same space (she’s about a foot shorter than I am) is to see someone with space to spare.

Actually, this is one of the reasons I really like my Millenia. It isn’t the fastest car, but it’s actually remarkably comfortable for me while still being a little on the smaller side. Nice.

You should post some pictures of your dog in your car. I’m fond of the Miata and the dog might make it look sort of Road Warrior-ish.

Just sayin’.

on Aug 12 2007 @ 05:25 PM
Post a Comment

If you are registered, please log in.
Name:

Email:

Location:

URL:

Smilies


Remember my personal information
Notify me of follow-up comments?

Submit the word you see below:

TimeLife.com
 

Zombyboy's Links

 
© 2005 by the authors of ResurrectionSong. All rights reserved.
Powered by ExpressionEngine