Quantcast
ResurrectionSong.com
Crushers, Feeders, Conveyors, and More

Magazines.com, Inc.

Syndication

Tuesday, August 02, 2005

Wedding Crashers: The Not Quite Review

It makes me happy that a movie like Stealth is turning out to be such a flop while a movie like Wedding Crashers is raking in the dough.

Neither is particularly original, but, let’s be honest, movies generally aren’t so much about originality as they are about telling a familiar story in a new and entertaining way. Stealth just looks like a mutant mash-up of every Frankenstein-meets-military technology movie to come down the pike with a heavy dose of the Top Gun bravado thrown in for spice. And I’m willing to bet that people are staying away for one simple reason: we’re willing to accept the familiar (Armageddon wasn’t original, but it was damned sure fun) as long as it isn’t, brutally put, lame.

The first time I saw the trailer for Stealth, I found myself wondering why the military didn’t just wait for the damned, evil, rogue artificially intelligent machine to run out of gas. Sure enough, as soon as the thought started forming in my head, someone in the theater whispered the very same thing loudly enough for everyone to hear. There was much snickering.

Fact is, the movie might have invented some very good reasons for its conceits, but the premise is just lame. Might as well have thrown up a big sign saying, “It’s Big! It’s Dumb! But Summer Audiences are Too Stupid to Notice!”

For these reasons, I’m glad it’s failing.

Wedding Crashers, on the other hand, is a worthy success.

Through the first two-thirds of the movie, it is riotously funny, horribly crass, and even a little bit ridiculous. Even better, Vince Vaughn and Owen Wilson have great screen chemistry for a buddy movie. It is quite possible that I will never see a funnier (or more realistic) non-drunken “I love you” scene between two guys in my life. And if that last third drags a little, ending as predictably as you could imagine, then at least we get to see Will Ferrell in a role that had to be played by Will Ferrell.

In Wedding Crashers, we get a movie that both revels in its badness and, yet, finds a way to steer itself toward reasonably moral ground--quite a trick. As for the Purple Heart controversy--well, suffice it to say that I didn’t see anything particularly offensive about it.

And, most importantly, Wedding Crashers brings back what used to be a staple of Summer Hollywood comedy fare: gratuitous nudity. It used to be that when a kid went to see raunchy comedies, they were damned near guaranteed at least one gratuitous glance of breasts. Airplane! had them. Fast Times at Ridgemont High (thank you, Lord) had them.

Recently, though, the comedy had grown raunchier and the gratuitous nudity had grown far less reliable. Wedding Crashers revives the tradition with gusto, and let’s hope that more movies follow suit.

Comments & Trackbacks
The trackback URL for this entry is:

I was already planning to see Wedding Crasher, but now it’s a lock. If Stealth had gratuitous nudity with Jessica Biel, however, then I would consider it…

on Aug 02 2005 @ 10:27 AM

That wouldn’t be quite good enough to get me to go--although I’d probably search the Internet to see if I could find pictures.

That’s wrong, isn’t it?

on Aug 02 2005 @ 10:29 AM

There is nothing wrong with the idea of Jessica Biel naked, no matter the context.

on Aug 02 2005 @ 11:32 AM

I’d be careful with statements like that, Jerry. I’m sure one of the regular commenters here can give you some naked Biel context you’ll regret hearing about.

on Aug 02 2005 @ 04:34 PM

Re: running out of gas.  “You fools!  You made it run on solar power!  All he has to do is to fly into sunlight to recharge his batteries!  When will you environmentalists ever learn!”

“Wedding Crashers” and “Sky High” seem like the only movies out worth watching.

on Aug 02 2005 @ 07:43 PM

Sky High does look pretty good.

The g-phrase and I were actually intending to see Charlie and the Chocolate Factory (I can’t get around the fact that it’s getting absolutely great reviews and everyone that I know who has seen it really enjoyed it). Charile wasn’t playing at a convenient time, so we ended up in Wedding Crashers. Happy accidents.

on Aug 02 2005 @ 08:53 PM

Matt: That’s a risk that I’m willing to take, especially of that naked context had naked photos to go along with it!

on Aug 03 2005 @ 05:46 AM
Post a Comment

If you are registered, please log in.
Name:

Email:

Location:

URL:

Smilies


Remember my personal information
Notify me of follow-up comments?

Submit the word you see below:

TimeLife.com
 
 
© 2005 by the authors of ResurrectionSong. All rights reserved.
Powered by ExpressionEngine