Quantcast
ResurrectionSong.com
Crushers, Feeders, Conveyors, and More

Magazines.com, Inc.

Syndication

Wednesday, April 05, 2006

The Libercontrarian…

...Is no longer a Libertarian.

Which, if I weren’t so damned tired, might lead me to write a post about how I’ve come to believe that none of the political parties are principled, but that their members most certainly can be. In the same way that a self-proclaimed Christian might also be a liar, a cheat, and an all around jerk, a person’s membership in the Republican (or Democrat or Green or Libertarian) party carries no guaranty of upstanding personal values.

Where does that leave me as a voter? Trying to make the best, most informed, and most ethically consistent choices that I can. It means voting for people that I think will take our national security, economic dangers, and personal freedoms seriously. It means that in recognizing that our elected leaders (and party leaders) don’t always act in a principled or intelligent fashion, I might have to do my part to pick up the slack.

Just kidding. Sort of.

I understand my friend’s disillusionment--and, in fact, I sympathize with it. It’s sad that it commonly leads to people who intentionally divorce themselves from our political processes (although I doubt that could ever happen with this gentleman).

Comments & Trackbacks
The trackback URL for this entry is:

Huh?
How in the heck does this have anything to do with American Idol?!?!

on Apr 05 2006 @ 10:00 PM

Nathan: The Mockerator.

on Apr 05 2006 @ 10:14 PM
Trackback from VodkaPundit
So Long LP
The Libertarian Party has driven away yet another member: I'm a party-free kind of guy right now. I was a...
Apr 06 2006 @ 08:36 AM

I don’t know whether you realize that your post starts:

“David_J

“...Is no longer a Libertarian.”

Because it does, you know.

Which makes the rest of the article rather confusing.  (If you want to do that trendy start-the-post-in-the-title thing, you might want you move the standard position your name is published in.)

As to the substance, I’m with Mike Rosen:  vote for the viable party that comes closest to matching your views, because party trumps person.  It’s all about the caucus.

TW: soviet.  I don’t know what that means here, but it’s a bit disturbing.

on Apr 06 2006 @ 09:28 AM
Post a Comment
TimeLife.com
 
 
© 2005 by the authors of ResurrectionSong. All rights reserved.
Powered by ExpressionEngine