Sunday, July 02, 2006
Superman Returns: The Superest Review Ever
If you’ve read the reviews you already know the basic premise of Superman Returns: this movie takes place in the same chronology as the previous films (ignoring things like advanced technologies and an obvious disconnect in the actual time line since the previous movies were all stuck in the United States of a few decades ago. Superman absented himself from our planet to visit the remains of his home world, hoping to find some connection to his birth world.
His return finds him an introverted, more complex character brooding over his place on our planet. Of course, this is still a Superman movie, so the brooding remains relatively light (even, ahem, sunny). It doesn’t help his disposition to come back to find that Lois Lane has become a mom and is living with another man.
Aside from that, the movie is filled with the normal Superman activities: rescuing damsels, stopping planes from falling to the ground, and posing very manfully while thwarting the evil plans of Lex Luthor. Good fun.
I’m not a Superman fan—from the comic books to the earlier movies, he’s always been too much of a good guy and far too powerful—so my knowledge of the mythology is incomplete and my care for propriety is even less impressive. I just showed up for the entertainment value and the knowledge that this is one of those summer films that absolutely requires viewing on the big screen; watching it on DVD just wouldn’t be the same.
Now, the review:
The Beginning Just isn’t so Super
The first twenty minutes or so are pretty slow. I was questioning whether I had made a good choice in dragging my girlfriend along. She was skeptical from the beginning and the pace and wooden acting of the opening scenes weren’t very encouraging.
Luckily, from the moment Superman performs his first super-deed, the pace picks up and the stilted early going was forgiven.
Superman is a Super Stalker
The love triangle that leaves Superman on the outside, wishing he could be with the reporter he loves, shows a gently jealous side of Superman that borders on the demented when it crosses over the line into stalkerdom. Which, in the service of giving us more depth and humanity in our alien superhero, works well in its context; which, considering his x-ray vision, super strength, and ability to be almost anywhere in the world in just a few moments time seems seriously unfair to the other masculine side of the triangle.
Lois isn’t Such a Super Mom
She’s late to pick up her kid, she leads him into danger, she apparently doesn’t ever take him to get haircuts…
But Kevin Spacey is a Super(b) Lex Luthor
Superb. While Gene Hackman was fun in a campy way, Spacey really brings the character to life. He is wonderfully evil.
Super(ior) Special Effects Make Superman Better
Watching the earlier movies now is a reminder of just how far special effects have come over the last thirty years. Everything looks more real and some of the shots border on the artistic. But the effects don’t get in the way of the characters or the story.
Of course, one of my favorite touches wasn’t much of a special effect at all: using the Marlon Brando archive footage for Jor-El was a nice touch. Brando—rightfully—has been roundly mocked for the money he demanded to take, essentially, an extended cameo role in Superman: The Move. Still, his voice and delivery were top notch and using his archive footage for this go ‘round brought some extra warmth and depth.
Still, Not Quite a Super Movie
Somehow, with all the pluses, it still isn’t quite a great movie for me—just a damned good one. Perhaps it hinges on the fact that it’s still a Superman movie. Or maybe it was that I couldn’t completely forgive the first twenty minutes. Or was it that the action didn’t flow in as compelling way as I expected or that Lex Luthor’s big, evil scheme didn’t really rope me in. It could just be that Superman—with the TV shows, the movies, and the comics—has been done so many times that I’m overly familiar with the pop icon even while not well-versed in the canonical mythology of the comic books.
And, let me say, the “Passion of the Superhero” parallel was just this side of disturbing. Salvation in blue tights isn’t the most comfortable fit.
I truly enjoyed the movie and would urge the rest of the class to take a few hours out of their summers to revel in this new look at a very old superhero. It was worth the eight bucks—but I doubt that I’ll ever watch the movie again. Contrast that with Batman Begins, the second Spider Man, and the first two X-Men movies and you’ll understand why I can’t quite go as far as to say that this was a super movie. Just a pretty damned good one.

Comments & Trackbacks
What about Parker Posey?!
The movie could stink to high heaven, but Brandon Routh will make it all worthwhile. I was at the grocery store tonight and I looked up and he was looming above me in some hung from the ceiling display and I just said under my breath, “f**k.”
Parker Posey (who, my girllfriend points out, has a perfect comicbook name) is really forgotten. She could have been used much better.
Brandon Routh is a mixed bag for me. There were times that I thought he was funny looking, times I thought he was intimidatingly attractive, times he looked like Christopher Reeves’ lost little brother, and times where I wondered if he would bother bringing anything special to his role. Reeves was still the best.
Just sayin’.
I dunno. I guess I was ruint by having been a Superman Comics fanatic as a kid. I was big on the Christopher Reeve movies, until they made the third one—and I haven’t even bothered to see the fourth one (yes, there was a fourth one, just ask IMDb). I was able to buy Dean Cain on TV because (1) it was TV, (2) Lane Smith as Perry White was a perfect excuse to break canon in other ways anyway, and (3 through 17) Teri Hatcher.
Since then, I’m pretty much sticking with the Cartoon Network versions, which roped me in with Batman anyway.
Maybe SR will make it into my Netflix queue someday, but I just don’t see the point of reviving the 1970s Superman movie franchise in 2006.
I think a lot of people must agree with you since it really isn’t doing the bang-up business that they had hoped. And next week, unless the next Pirates of the Caribean movie sucks, Supe is toast.
I never got into the comic, I didn’t watch the TV programs, and I haven’t seen the Cartoon Network stuff. Honestly, Superman has slipped past me other than the first two Christopher Reeve movies (and, yes, the third one was bad and the fourth one bordered on the offenseive). I still think this one is worth seeing in the theaters if you’re in the habit of seeing the summer “event” movies, though. It really is fun at times (I’m pretty sure that Michelle Malkin walked out before it got interesting), the effects really are top notch, and Kevin Spacey is seriously cool as Lex Luthor.
Sorry to disagree with you, old chap, but I hated this movie. Booooorrrrrinnnnngg. Keving Spacey and Parker Posey were terrific, but since their time on screen was minimal, they weren’t enough to save the day. (Oh wait, that’s Mighty Mouse.)
Parker Posey was definitely wasted--Kevin Spacey remains my favorite part of the movie.
I didn’t hate this one, though. It was just sort of a mixed bag. It helps to have no real love of Superman movies and no real expectations, maybe. My girlfriend really enjoyed it (but she’s a pretty easy touch).
I think a lot of people must agree with you since it really isn’t doing the bang-up business that they had hoped.
Meh. I think people are just wary of all the hype. We were hearing about how this movie was going to blow everybody’s socks off, back while they were still casting the dang thing.