Quantcast
ResurrectionSong.com
Crushers, Feeders, Conveyors, and More

Magazines.com, Inc.

Syndication

Monday, August 15, 2005

Keep Your Dirty, Filthy Hands Off My…

Er. Yeah. Anyway…

Government plans to make fertility treatment more accessible to single women and lesbian couples are likely to be ineffective because of a severe shortage of sperm donors, a leading fertility expert has told the Guardian.
[...]
Many clinics only offer fertility treatment to heterosexual couples to ensure they comply with the 1990 Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority Act. It states that clinics must consider the welfare of the future child and specifically the need for a father figure before offering treatment.

There is probably a serious side to this story that touches on a shortage of sperm donors and lesbian couples and singles attempting to have kids. There are probably interesting questions to be asked about the prioritization of dispersal of these sperm donations.

But, of course, I just keep wanting to make jokes about serial sperm donors, private donation options, and the possibility of singing “sperm, sperm, sperm, sperm” to the Monty Python “Spam” song.

Yep. I’m completely ashamed.

Read the story.

Comments & Trackbacks
The trackback URL for this entry is:

Father figure?
Man, that phrase sticks in my craw.

Kids need a father, not a father figure.  Still, I understand the sentiment, considering the high percentage of prison inmates who were raised without fathers…

on Aug 15 2005 @ 09:25 AM

Oh, and, yes, ZB, you should be ashamed.  For penance, go watch the public service cartoon from Johnny Dangerously 3 times and see if you can add even more wisecracks to this post.

on Aug 15 2005 @ 09:29 AM

Every Sperm is Sacred wouldn’t suffice?

And, given that they’re talking about lesbian couples, would you suspect that the father figure would have pins sticking into it?

on Aug 15 2005 @ 07:53 PM
Rae

I agree with Nathan, but I will say that my brother who was raised without a father, but with a father figure, is a man of integrity and character, and in terms of “success” (read:  worldly success), he is.

I don’t think I turned out too bad myself.

I will say that my brother and I do wonder at how we would have turned out if we had had a real father.  The donators (and that is all they really were regardless of being married to our mother) were some majorly messed-up men and I am certain that we were better off without them.  That doesn’t necessarily apply to everyone, but it did for two children out there.

To categorically say that children don’t need a “father/father figure” is a sad deception.  I very much believe in the contributions of both sexes to form an emotionally and cognitively healthy child growing into an adult.

on Aug 16 2005 @ 07:44 AM

Rae,
Good point.  Better a father figure than a male who doesn’t shoulder the responsibility of being actively involved in the raising of his children.

on Aug 16 2005 @ 08:05 AM

Kids need dads.  Choosing to be in a situation without a father is irresponsible.  The families that have that thrust upon them and do what they can to survive and thrive are heroic.  God’s plan, mom and dad, I know, I’m simplistic.  AND . . . dear husband will be with me on Saturday, is that okay?

on Aug 16 2005 @ 09:51 AM

Of course it is. Unless he expects me to call him “dear husband,” in which case we’ve got a problem.

As for the parenting thing, I do have to say this: I am a supporter of same sex couples adopting kids. I have first hand knowledge of a couple instances where it has been ably demonstrated to me that a child can find a healthy, loving, nurturing home with lesbian or gay parents.

I don’t consider that ideal (in that I do think that kids need good role models of both sexes to help them develop healthy ideas of how men and women and boys and girls interact), I do consider it to be better than the alternative in some situations.

I’ll leave it at that.

on Aug 16 2005 @ 11:30 AM
Rae

Stacy, I believe in God’s plan, too.  I appreciate and agree with the allowance for those who didn’t specifically choose to ignore the contributions of a specific sex, but the issue is that not everyone believes in God’s plan, and if someone isn’t a Christian, why should those who are expect them to adhere to convictions stemming from God?

It is an OT thought, but I really struggle with the lack of grace that Christians have for those who don’t believe just as they do.  For years I would become angy and frustrated with people who behaved differently than I thought they should behave, according to my beliefs.  Plainly put, if I claim to believe that it is the Holy Spirit of God that frames my paradigm (regenerates me), why do I expect those without the Holy Spirit of God to have the same paradigm?

on Aug 16 2005 @ 01:06 PM

Wheels, now that I’ve actually read through the comments (sorry, folks, but my time spent blogging has been cut into considerably over the last few days), I see that you are right.

“Every Sperm is Sacred” would have been the perfect Monty Python song for this post.

on Aug 16 2005 @ 06:58 PM
Post a Comment

If you are registered, please log in.
Name:

Email:

Location:

URL:

Smilies


Remember my personal information
Notify me of follow-up comments?

Submit the word you see below:

TimeLife.com
 
 
© 2005 by the authors of ResurrectionSong. All rights reserved.
Powered by ExpressionEngine