Quantcast
ResurrectionSong.com
Crushers, Feeders, Conveyors, and More

Magazines.com, Inc.

Syndication

Tuesday, July 17, 2007

Harry Potter, Dead Characters, and Other Spooky Stuff (Updated)

So, the full Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows book has leaked and now fans are scurrying about to find out who lives, who dies, and what happily ever after looks like in the Potterverse. I won’t be one of those trying to discover the ending, although I am curious to see how JK Rowling ties up her many loose ends.

The funniest part about me reading the book, though, is that I can’t stand some of the characters that I’m supposed to love. Harry is a little jerk. He started as a sympathetic character and then grew up to be a teenager--in a way, I can’t help but feel that Rowling tapped into the same vein of whiny adolescence that made Luke Skywalker seem so irritating to me when I was a kid. Then there is Dumbledore with his so-obvious favoritism and unmatched ability to put the lives of children in the school in danger--let’s just say that I don’t understand how this intellectual featherweight is considered to be such a wise person in the Potterverse.

There is one character that I’ve grown to appreciate, though. Snape may have a bit of evil in him (or, maybe, a big bit of evil), but he has consistently done what he could to keep Harry safe. Whatever his native instincts, he does continue to do his best to do what is right (that last bit in The Half-Blood Prince notwithstanding). He’s cranky, snippy, vengeful, occasionally mean, and hardly pleasant--but he’s gotten a raw deal from Harry and his gang of snot-nose-know-it-alls from the beginning. It’s tough to be Severus Snape, but he soldiers on, and that counts big to me.

Since I won’t be indulging in he ultimate spoiler, I have only my imagination to give me clues to what Deathly Hallows holds for me. For example, unlike many, I do believe that Dumbledore is dead and that he will stay that way. It would be cheap (and it would cheapen the emotion that some people felt when he died in the last book) to conjure up some parlor trick to bring him back. I insist that he stay dead because the alternative would possibly ruin the series for me.

I don’t believe that Harry will die. He isn’t quite a messianic figure, so his ultimate sacrifice isn’t necessary for the book to wind up with a satisfactory ending. Aside from that, the kid deserves a chance to grow up and experience life outside the shadow of ultimate evil that has hovered over him since the beginning of the series. Given the growth of Snape, I do think that he will die. I think he will die in service to the gang of snot-nose-know-it-alls--perhaps saving the life of Harry or one of the others--in some way that completes his redemption and perhaps even gives Harry a moment of thought about the assumptions he had made and the small cruelties that he and his friends had shown the teacher.

As a bonus, though, I think one of the friends--either Hermione or Ron--will be killed at some point in the book. It’s the Kleenex moment that the series has been crying for; a moment that will put an emotional spin on the series that no one will forget.

But what the hell do I know? I’m just a guy who thinks that JK Rowling did a damned fine job of creating a little world of magic that has been enjoyable as a minor, occasional escape. Good for her (and good for all the kids that might have been bit by the reading bug because of Harry and the rest of the crew).

None of which explains why this guy was following me with his Evil Satellites of Doom during my visit to St. Augustine this past week. Creepy bastard.

Update: Speaking of creepy, this has to be somewhere in that conversation. Ewww.

Comments & Trackbacks
The trackback URL for this entry is:

Personally, I think Draco Malfoy grows up to become a United States Senator, sitting right next to Sen. Blutarski.

on Jul 17 2007 @ 11:33 AM

Which would make me cry, if I lived in that state…

on Jul 17 2007 @ 11:34 AM

I have a satellite photo showing the secret location of the new Potter book storage depot.

But now I’m not going to share it with you, because you called me “creepy” and hurt my feelings.

on Jul 17 2007 @ 12:01 PM

Ah, c’mere and gimme a hug, li’l feller…

So, Robert, do you like movies about gladiators?

McGehee, your plot twist would scar the minds of children across the globe. That’s just evil.

on Jul 17 2007 @ 12:17 PM

"Mommy, when David hugs me I get a tingly feeling in my special place. Why does he always want us to take off our shirts to hug?”

Eww, I just squicked myself out.

on Jul 17 2007 @ 12:45 PM

Yeah, that really shouldn’t have happened.

on Jul 17 2007 @ 12:48 PM

Overrated, overhyped.  Yawn.  Meanwhile, I’m part way through several really good book series.  Janny Wurts’ Wars of Light and Shadow, Steven Erikson’s Malazan Book of the Fallen, Thomas Harlan’s In the Time of the Sixth Sun ( Wasteland of Flint, House of Reeds ), Tad Williams’ Shadowmarch & Shadowplay.

Rowling?  Pshaw.

tw: told64 - if I told you once, I told you 64 times ...

on Jul 17 2007 @ 01:25 PM

It wasn’t my fault. It was the cough syrup.

on Jul 17 2007 @ 01:37 PM

Robert goes for the low blow…

(Nicely done.)

Robin, I started reading the books not out of any sincere belief that they would be great, but because it irritated me that people were trying to ban them from libraries and generally idiotic stuff about them being evil. My take is that they are lightweight in the extreme, entertaining but not engrossing, but much fun in that the world they describe is truly fantastic. Right now I’ve almost finished Stephen R. Lawhead’s Hood (it was my beach book--which ended up being, far more, my airplane book) and can recommend that, but I’m thinking that the average 11 year old would probably be bored by the thing.

on Jul 17 2007 @ 01:59 PM

You know, I am a reader.  An avid reader.  My children are readers.  Ravenous ones.  We have shelves of books on witchcraft.  And not one of us has ever read a Harry Potter book.  We’ve tried, it just never happens.

That said, I am all about Rowling and her pull-herself-up-by-her-bootstraps story.  I’d buy all of her books, merely to support her rise from welfare on sheer creativity.  I’d probably never read them, but I sure will throw her my $25.99.

on Jul 17 2007 @ 06:48 PM

SPAMĀ® with Bacon?

What kind of wonderful, magical animal could produce this?

on Jul 17 2007 @ 10:21 PM

Waidaminnit… SPAM is made from actual animal parts?!?

I thought it was petroleum jelly mixed with sawdust and old Mafia victims they had on ice for 50 years. Meh. Whodathunkit.

And as for me, I already have a copy of HP7 held in reserve at the B&N in downtown Denver, which I will be picking up at midnight just like the rest of my no-respect-for-talent-but-plenty-of-respect-for-a-good-escapism-tool hoi polloi cohort. Unfortunately, my roommate has first dibs (the greedy bitch), so I won’t have it read until after 2pm.

on Jul 18 2007 @ 02:33 AM

Snape kills Englebert Humperdink.

on Jul 22 2007 @ 06:21 PM
Post a Comment

If you are registered, please log in.
Name:

Email:

Location:

URL:

Smilies


Remember my personal information
Notify me of follow-up comments?

Submit the word you see below:

TimeLife.com
 
 
© 2005 by the authors of ResurrectionSong. All rights reserved.
Powered by ExpressionEngine