![]() |
|
resurrectionsongJanuary 27, 2005Ponder ThisShould Jesus be a brand? Should Christianity come with nifty slogans and a killer (if obviously appropriated) logo? The question is whether the profit motive or the desire to make Christianity look more exciting takes away from the actual message and purpose of following Christ's teachings--and I think the answer has to be yes. In the same way that installing a Subway or Burger King or Starbucks inside one of the mega churches is wrong: it completely misses the point of a house of worship and learning. Now, the balancing argument is that Christians need to find a way of getting their message across to a culture that is far more comfortable with bite-sized messages, slick marketing, and immediately recognizable logos. There is some truth to the argument, but it fails to recognize one important thing: Christianity, like life, isn't meant to always be an easy, pretty, bite-sized journey. The study of Christianity is a scholarly and spiritual pursuit where the answers aren't always easy. Posted by zombyboy at January 27, 2005 12:59 PMComments
Zomby, you really have to ask yourself.. What would Jesus do? Then you tell me if he's already not a spokesperson for Christianity. He's the face of that religion. Think about it. He was the first Ronald McDonald. The first Mascot. The first Dave Thomas. The first Noid. Of course, he had to die to get the PR contract - but them's the breaks. Posted by: Hector Vex at January 27, 2005 01:29 PMZ, That was an excellent response. Posted by: zombyboy at January 27, 2005 02:18 PMZomby, Superhero's right. Your thoughts are excellent, but not really the same issue that I'm driving at. In response to your question, I'm fine with Christianity having logos and cool t-shirts and a sort of "marketing buzz" if you want to call it that. But I really wish we'd do something *original* and *creative* in that direction, instead of scamming off other people's stuff. Think about it. Why do people who claim to worship the *creator and sustainer* of the universe seem unable to do anything but cop marketing brands from secular establishments and slap Jesus' name on them? In fact, to piggyback on Superhero's point, our inability to come up with something original is *diluting* the Christian brand. Now, I will say this, the cross is a great brand. But what we're getting with these t-shirts is not. Posted by: bryan at January 27, 2005 03:16 PMSupe- how ya been? :DI haven't seen you around in such a long time. I second Zomby's compliment, but have to confess, that I am chewing and will come back later. Posted by: Rae at January 27, 2005 03:16 PMIn your way of thinking, then, Christianity wouldn't need missionaries, right? Just drop off the books in the correct language and it sells itself? Posted by: Isaac B2 at January 27, 2005 03:29 PMNo, to me there's a difference between evangelizing and selling--one you do for the benefit of the other person, the other you do to line your own pocket. There's also a differences between honestly discussing scripture and offering up bumpersticker style sentiment and slogans--which is why I get my political philosophy from books rather than t-shirts. Posted by: zombyboy at January 27, 2005 03:33 PM |
| All content ©2003 by the authors of ResurrectionSong.com except where noted. |