![]() |
|
resurrectionsongSeptember 20, 2004Review: Sky Captain and the World of Tomorrow (Updated)Sky Captain and the World of Tomorrow is going to be big. It's going to be really big. And when it’s done being big at the movie theaters, it's going to be big on DVD. Not subtle, not meaningful, and not without gaping plot holes, Sky Captain has the one thing that makes up for all of its other drawbacks: fun. It would be hard to name a movie from the last few years that was as devoted to being a fun ride as this one was--and not in a lewd, American Pie kind of way, but in a wholesome good guys-bad guys way. There wasn't a single face that walked out of the theater without a grin firmly in place after the movie was over, and that is why this movie will be successful. The story is familiar: mad scientist plots to destroy the world, intrepid (and cute) lady reporter works hard to expose the plot, courageous pilot fights to save the world, and, somewhere along the ride, there's a happy ending. The familiarity lets the viewer focus on what's important. Namely, the gorgeous graphics, the fun gadgets, and the cliffhanger aesthetic of the thing. The graphics, of course, deserve their own mention (and, I would wager, an Oscar). The film was shot against a blue screen, and almost all of the surroundings were later added in with computer animation. Only the tiniest number of props--those things that were handled directly by the actors--were real, and everything else from the snowy mountains of Tibet to the giant robots moving through the streets of Manhattan were created by computer. Of course, there's nothing new about that. From Titanic and Who Framed Roger Rabbit to Star Wars: Episode One and Toy Story, the audience is used to computer animation and often seeing it mixed in with live action. What makes it unique here is the scope and the look. The look, all soft edges and washed out colors, isn't just a nod to old cliffhangers, it's the overall mood of the movie. This is in everything from the design of the virtual sets, the rockets and robots, and the style of acting. Blue screen work is often difficult for actors; it's hard reacting to those things that will only exist months down the road when the computers have done their magic. In this case, though, the understated, slightly removed acting is exactly in line with the rest of the movie. It all feels like something that had been filmed in forties. And the acting works. Gwyneth Paltrow is spunky and fine as the reporter, Polly Perkins. Special note goes to the charismatic Jude Law (who seems to be popping up in all sorts of movies this year) as Joe "Sky Captain" Sullivan and a picture-perfect Giovanni Ribisi as Dex Dearborn, the gadget-building sidekick. Even their names seem to be something straight out of a golden era science fiction story. I would like to say that the movie was inventive and unique, but that would be a lie. What it is happens to be a loving remembrance of the way movies used to be made, but there is nothing unique about this movie. Many of the visuals come straight out of other movies (even to the point of a few Darth Maul moments). From the visual style of Metropolis to the bubble headed helmets of Flash Gordon, Sky Captain steals the best, the corniest, the most fun, and the most daring of a wealth of other movies; and it does it so well that it will be the rare movie patron that minds the blatant theft. Sky Captain, while not unique will still exist in a modern realm of its own. The world isn't clamoring for more of this kind of fare, and, barring any sequels, it is doubtful that imitators of this great movie chameleon would be anything near as successful as Sky Captain will be. While it could have been a mockery of the movies that it imitated, instead, played straight, it's just brilliant fun. Hurry out and see it on the big screen; this one is well worth the money (especially if you catch a matinee--but that might just be nostalgia talking). Update: De Doc likes it, too. Posted by zombyboy at September 20, 2004 10:16 AMComments
I haven't seen it yet, but I can't emphasize this enough: GIANT FREAKIN' ROBOTS! Z, when I first saw the trailer on apple I was instantly wowed by the retro feel. The movie that came closest to this in such a long time would be The Shadow, and you know how corny that was. ;) For the record, the trailer alone made me want to buy a bomber jacket. Posted by: OF Jay at September 20, 2004 12:51 PMI'm not much of a movie goer, but I've GOT to see this one. OF Jay: Bomber jacket? Uh oh. The 80's really are back, aren't they? Posted by: Patrick at September 20, 2004 04:20 PMYes, but what of Angelina Jolie's boobs? Posted by: Trench at September 20, 2004 04:29 PMTrench. They're beautiful. I haven't seen the movie, either, but I'm quite sure of this answer. Posted by: Margi at September 20, 2004 05:48 PMMargi, love, they stayed hidden the whole time. In black leather and 30's retro-bubble-helmet-harness. Rowf. ;-) Posted by: De Doc at September 20, 2004 06:04 PMFor a movie without nekkid chicks and zombies, this sounds pretty cool. Posted by: Jerry at September 20, 2004 06:15 PMTrench: Rent Gia (http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0123865/) to see Angelina's boobies nekkid. More to to the point, to see Angelina's boobies nekkid in lesbian scenes. Heh, heh heh, hehehehe... Posted by: Jerry at September 20, 2004 06:17 PMOooooo, I can't wait to see it, but honestly there hasn't been much that the lovely luminescent Gwyenth has done that I haven't loved. Posted by: Rae at September 20, 2004 06:50 PMJerry, it might not have nekkid chicks or zombies, but it does, as I pointed out earlier, have GIANT FRICKIN' ROBOTS! which makes up for a lot. Come to think of it, if Hollywood ever made a movie with nekkid chicks, zombies, giant robots, gratuitous lesbian sex scenes and a Bullit quality car chase they'd pretty much never need to make another movie ever again. Posted by: Matt Navarre at September 20, 2004 08:15 PMI haven't seen it yet, but the "fun" and "walk out with grins" description reminds me of two other movies that felt like that to me: The Rocketeer (for other 30's retro) and Silverado (for even-more-retro). Posted by: wheels at September 20, 2004 08:16 PMMatt: You, sir, have an excellent point! Posted by: Jerry at September 20, 2004 09:33 PMO.K. What! is it about lesbian sex scenes that is so damn fascinating for males to watch? The breastlove, I can grasp, this I simply cannot..... Posted by: Rae at September 20, 2004 11:16 PMI don't know, Rae. I will say that over the last year, lesbian scenes have lost all attraction to me. And I couldn't begin to tell you why. Posted by: Nathan at September 21, 2004 09:47 AMNathan: I'll make one guess of two names, one starting with W and ending in E and the other's initials are J and C. :-D Patrick: Bomber jackets are 80s relics? Noooooo! Posted by: OF Jay at September 21, 2004 11:25 AMHmmm... wife and Jesus Christ? Posted by: Rae at September 21, 2004 09:08 PM |
| All content ©2003 by the authors of ResurrectionSong.com except where noted. |