![]() |
|
resurrectionsongApril 22, 2004Record Industry Russian RouletteThe record industry is suicidal. That is the only possible explanation for the desire to hike prices on legal download sites like Apple's Music Store. I kept expecting this story to go away, but it keeps surfacing.
Not only is the idea of paying $2.49 for an individually downloaded song ridiculous, but it is utterly unnecessary. The industry is building a new flow of income and wooing people away from illegal downloading with successful (and still growing) legal sites. A price hike will kill the legal sites and will probably re-invigorate file trading services. At $.99/song, the cost is reasonable. The product that is sold digitally requires no expense for packaging, no expense for inventory, and only the cost of digitizing and distribution that Apple takes as a loss leader to fuel sales of the iPod. So, essentially, the industry is saying that they'll take their savings and charge you more. Fools. Sama wrote about this subject a few weeks ago. As I said, I kept hoping it would simply go away. But never underestimate the incompetence of the record industry. Posted by zombyboy at April 22, 2004 01:18 PM | TrackBackComments
I've seen this before a couple of times and it surprises me every time. Raising the per-song price, especially to the outrageous $2.49, will kill those labels in the download market. On the other hand, it will certainly give the independents a fighting chance. Posted by: StumpJumper at April 22, 2004 01:29 PMThe article doesn't give a link to any reporting on the topic. Any other links than a column? Posted by: bryan at April 23, 2004 08:29 AMThanks for the mention. Some friends and I were discussing this very thing over the weekend. SOng prices need to go down, not up. At $.99 per song, every download is thought through and made judiciously. If they charges $.10 per song, poeple would be wreckless and treat them like cellphone minutes. THAT's what the music industry should want. They're so pig-headed. Posted by: sama at April 26, 2004 10:33 AMPost a comment
|
| All content ©2003 by the authors of ResurrectionSong.com except where noted. |