![]() |
|
resurrectionsongDecember 05, 2003Ouch. That hurt. (Updated)I think I've just been insulted (and a lot of the rest of you, too).
Of course, with sparkling rhetoric like that, it's hard to keep liking our President. And links to "99 Reasons Why Bush Sucks" and "Regime Change Countdown", I feel my support further waning. No. Really. The most disappointing thing about the site, though, is that there aren't too many pictures of the "babes." And the pictures that you do see don't really support the "babe" moniker, anyhow. More like "garden variety sluts with underdeveloped political intelligence." Now, you want to talk about a babe, then you should check out this site. Not only is she beautiful, but she knows how to speak without resorting to "He didn't really win the electoral vote, either" type lies. Hell, I'm starting to think that, with a little effort, we could put together a Babes for Bush site that would just trounce those little porn star wannabes. I'm just sayin'... Upddate: J Bowen is in the spirit: Ugly and Proud! Can I get an amen? Posted by zombyboy at December 5, 2003 11:09 AM | TrackBackComments
A couple of the idiots associated with this were on Hannity and Colmes last night. Alan had to dress the guy down for hyperbole, and that was before the guy accused Hannity of being a crack smoker and illiterate. Heh. Babes for Bush. You know, I think I like that. Posted by: Deb at December 5, 2003 12:59 PMGod, I wish I'd seen it, that sounds like fun. Hell, if I were a babe, I'd start it up myself... Posted by: zombyboy at December 5, 2003 01:06 PMI've been shooting with Dana of Noteitposts. She's really cool in person, too. Posted by: nathan at December 5, 2003 01:40 PMBabes for Bush? Isn't that a porn site? Posted by: Walter at December 5, 2003 05:28 PM"garden variety sluts with underdeveloped political intelligence." Nicely put. Posted by: Patterico at December 6, 2003 11:02 AMBabes for Bush.... hey, you start it, I'll join it. Nathan - Awww. Thanks. :) Likewise, of course. Posted by: Dana at December 6, 2003 07:37 PMPost a comment
|
| All content ©2003 by the authors of ResurrectionSong.com except where noted. |