ResurrectionSong.com

Jerry's Links

Single of the Week

resurrectionsong

June 02, 2003

Mass-Media Makes the Case for Scott Peterson

Debra Saunders has written a story on Townhall.com that calls the media to back off of the Laci Peterson story. Her contention is that by giving credence to every little defense maneuver, the media is making it easier for the defense to convince the public of Scott Peterson's innocence.

Fox News' Geraldo Rivera reported "exclusively" that a "defense source" told him that Laci's body had been "carved up" and "there were internal parts missing." (The dissection twist, expert TV panelists argued, supported the Satanic Cult Real Killers theory.)

On Thursday came leaks of the autopsy. MSNBC reported that "plastic tape" was found around the neck of Laci's unborn son. "Finding in Peterson case could be used to bolster defense theory on killings," read the MSNBC website's sub-headline. The story continued, "The finding could be used by the defense team for Scott Peterson, Laci's husband, who is accused in her death, to bolster its theory that Laci and the fetus were killed in a satanic ritual."

Stop the presses -- there may be litter in the bay. In fact, what NBC called "plastic tape" a reporter who read the leaked autopsy described as "nylon and twine."'


Saunders notes that the OJ's defense team used the same tactics successfully throughout his trial. While not saying that Scott Peterson is guilty, she thinks that media sources might make it impossible for the prosecutors to prove their case--essentially robbing the prosecutor of the possibility of a fair trial.

Of course, this contention hinges on the assumption of OJ Simpson's guilt. I think she might just have a point.

Read the story.

Off topic: We can all agree that were we to have been on the jury in that case, OJ would be rotting in jail, right? I mean, c'mon...running for the border with his fake beard, loads of cash, a revolver and a weapon. History of abuse. This guy was just screaming, "Please put me in jail. Please."

Posted by zombyboy at June 2, 2003 12:00 AM | TrackBack
Comments

Maybe we should just let the press try this case. It would save the taxpayers tons of money on court cost.



I have a better idea. Let's just starting using polls on the Internet. Would that not be a true opinion of "a jury of your peers"?



Don't editors ever say no, we are not going to report this shit, it will affect the jury poll?



Visit me @ http://greg.blog-city.com

Posted by: Greg at June 2, 2003 10:46 PM

Nah, editors sit around saying, "I don't care how much sense it makes. Will we sell more ads and grab more eyes?"



Mass media outlets make it pretty easy to be jaded, don't they?

Posted by: zombyboy at June 2, 2003 10:58 PM

Now this is a switch. Usually, it's the *defense* that complains about not being able to have a fair trial.



But seriously, re: editors. I don't think most editors (mid-level anyway) even consider whether stories will bring in advertising - at least on the print side. There's a pretty strong wall between advertising and editorial and the journos pride themselves on keeping it that way (at least, except for free book, movie and CD reviews). But I can't say with TV. TV, especially during sweeps month, will run anything that contains sex or greed.



So maybe "editors" should be more likely termed "producers"

bryan [bryan@arguewithsigns.net]

Posted by: A visitor at June 2, 2003 11:29 PM

I have a confession to make. I didn't really accept O.J.'s guilt until after his acquittal.



But then, I'd already seen California courts in action from having grown up there; if he was acquitted, he HAD to be guilty...

McGehee [flyover@mcgeheezone.com]

Posted by: A visitor at June 3, 2003 02:21 AM

Let's see what the jury does. Hopefully, they will do the right thing based on the relevant evidence.


Adam Studnicki


Injury Lawyer

Studnicki, Jaffe & Woods, PLLC

http://www.sjwlawyers.com

http://www.studnickilaw.com

Posted by: Adam Studnicki at December 6, 2003 02:16 AM
Post a comment









Remember personal info?






RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Search This Site


Site Archives

Recent Entries Consider the Birds
Ugh... (Updated)
Moderate Conservative Manifesto
Forwarded from a Friend
ResurrectionSong: Help Wanted

Blogroll
All content ©2003 by the authors of ResurrectionSong.com except where noted.