![]() |
|
resurrectionsongJune 02, 2003Mass-Media Makes the Case for Scott PetersonDebra Saunders has written a story on Townhall.com that calls the media to back off of the Laci Peterson story. Her contention is that by giving credence to every little defense maneuver, the media is making it easier for the defense to convince the public of Scott Peterson's innocence. Fox News' Geraldo Rivera reported "exclusively" that a "defense source" told him that Laci's body had been "carved up" and "there were internal parts missing." (The dissection twist, expert TV panelists argued, supported the Satanic Cult Real Killers theory.) Saunders notes that the OJ's defense team used the same tactics successfully throughout his trial. While not saying that Scott Peterson is guilty, she thinks that media sources might make it impossible for the prosecutors to prove their case--essentially robbing the prosecutor of the possibility of a fair trial. Of course, this contention hinges on the assumption of OJ Simpson's guilt. I think she might just have a point. Off topic: We can all agree that were we to have been on the jury in that case, OJ would be rotting in jail, right? I mean, c'mon...running for the border with his fake beard, loads of cash, a revolver and a weapon. History of abuse. This guy was just screaming, "Please put me in jail. Please." Posted by zombyboy at June 2, 2003 12:00 AM | TrackBackComments
Maybe we should just let the press try this case. It would save the taxpayers tons of money on court cost. Nah, editors sit around saying, "I don't care how much sense it makes. Will we sell more ads and grab more eyes?" Now this is a switch. Usually, it's the *defense* that complains about not being able to have a fair trial. I have a confession to make. I didn't really accept O.J.'s guilt until after his acquittal. Let's see what the jury does. Hopefully, they will do the right thing based on the relevant evidence.
Post a comment
|
| All content ©2003 by the authors of ResurrectionSong.com except where noted. |